California Lady Moves to Red State, Suddenly Sends Unexpected Message to Lib Friends Back Home

Is it all liberals or just those that live in California that seem to think those who live in the Midwest are ‘backwards’. Maybe it’s just that middle America to most is considered the ‘Bible belt’ and they just try to avoid our red states.

Leah Singer a California writer said, “I used to say I’d never move to a red state. And then I did. And it’s changed my life for the better…”

Leah Singer, a freelance writer, never imagined that she would end up in Trump Country… but when she moved to Indiana not long ago, her entire perception changed.

In an editorial piece published last weekend in the Indianapolis Star, the author sent a clear message to liberal friends back in California and throughout the country: You might be wrong about “red states.”

“I used to say I’d never move to a red state. And then I did. And it’s changed my life for the better,” Singer admitted.

As a “California girl,” the writer explained that the left-leaning West coast sees itself as a bastion of “diversity,” but Singer hinted that it was less of a paradise for anybody who didn’t parrot the liberal talking points.

“I was raised in California, where we like to believe diversity is applauded and opportunities abound,” she explained. “In many ways, California’s blue state bubble can be a very safe place to live if you subscribe to the popular liberal politics.”

In other words, it was diverse only if you thought and talked the same as everyone else, which kind of defeats the point. Regardless, Singer was a bit apprehensive about starting her new life in a conservative region.
“Over and over, I was questioned about why I would ever leave the Golden State for a ‘flyover’ red state. This phrase alone troubled me, and the implied perception that one flies over the Midwest just to get to their East or West coast home,” she stated.

Like sheltered people naively asking about a faraway land they’ve only vaguely heard about, the writer’s West coast friends had a lot of curiosity about how things were in America’s heartland.

“As I settled into life in the Midwest, I heard the same assumptive questions: ‘Did everyone you know vote for Donald Trump?’ ‘Are there African-American, Jewish, Asian, LGBTQ people in Indiana?’ ‘Do people make fun of you for listening to National Public Radio?’” Singer recalled.

The coastal transplant quickly realized that her past impressions of conservative America were nowhere near the reality.

“As I got to know my new Midwest home, I realize how living in a bubble and subscribing to the Middle America stereotypes is truly damaging to this country,” she explained.

“Never does one ask how the Indiana public schools provide many opportunities that have been cut from California’s public schools because of one budget crisis after another,” Singer continued.

“Never does one ask about the low cost of living that is allowing us to pay off the mountain of debt we accrued in California. And never does one ask about my fellow community members, who are running successful businesses, enriching the city’s arts and making a difference for the local environment.”

She noticed something that “enlightened” coastal liberals often ignore: Places such as California may not be as truly diverse as they pretend to be.

“Southern California is diverse racially and religiously; it really is not with respect to class or working poor,” the writer revealed.

“This is especially the case in San Diego County, where it’s becoming more difficult for middle-class families to own a home or afford rent, with 41% of homeowners and 57% of renters spending 30% or more of income on housing, all while incomes stay stagnant, according to the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce.”

In simple terms, many places in liberal enclaves have become so expensive to live that economic diversity is a thing of the past. It’s a bit like pretending that a gated community where everyone is a doctor or lawyer and drives a BMW is “diverse” — different racial boxes may be checked but it’s all a bit boring.

In the end, Singer’s positive experience with the Midwest helped her realize that many coastal elites purposely bury their heads in the sand when it comes to real diversity within the United States.

“(H)ow many of these people travel within their own country to get to know the ‘other?’ Why travel the globe, but not make an effort to get to know your Midwest neighbor?” the author asked.

“Living in Indiana, I now have an understanding of America that I did not before. I wish more people living outside the middle took the time to get to know the others living a few states away. I did, and I am a better person because of it,” she concluded.

Amen! Those who live in the Midwest or the ‘Bible belt’ are actually some of the hardest working, downright friendly and patriotic people you will ever meet.

Source: Conservative Tribune

Pelosi Heavily Slurs “PRESCRIPTION DRUGS” On LIVE TV Meltdown! Mentally UNFIT! RESIGN NOW!

Nancy Pelosi was at it again doing her best “Aunt Clara” imitation, for those youngsters not familiar with the bubbling mumbling zany aunt of Samantha Stevens in the classic 1960’s sitcom “Bewitched,” played by character actress Marion Lorne, who would create all sorts of chaos, confusion and mayhem. However Pelosi (sad to say) “isn’t play acting,” she’s the real deal, as this brief video clip reveals.

The Democratic Minority Leader is no stranger to putting her 77-year old foot in her mouth, like the lovable, scatterbrained “Aunt Clara” when Nancy speaks confusion follows.

This week the California lawmaker just returned to Washington to hold her weekly press conference, and instantly began doing her best “Aunt Clara” imitation, mumbling stumbling and repeating words and having one of those “senior moments” trouble saying “Martin Luther King” and slurring “prescription drugs.”

Pelosi had intended to use Rev. Martin Luther King’s legacy as a political talking point in pushing a progressive agenda of socialized medicine, however, what ensued was a rambling, incoherent performance, reminiscent of her past performances, which seems to have become more problematic with each year.

The congresswoman retreated to her notes time and again attempting to display a cohesive presentation to the media that had gathered to report on her press conference.

At one point she stumbled within her remarks appearing confused saying she was “inspired by Dr. King’s call for fairness, opportunity, and… equal oppor— opportunity, and equal acc— uh, acc– access to equality.”

She continued speaking appearing more lucid saying: “It’s really sad the Republicans tax cut.”

Then moments later she looked at the ceiling as if trying to remember her next line, then blurting out “86”, then exclaiming “83% of the benefits go to the top one percent,” she said. “It’s really sad,” she repeated.

Once again suffering a momentary lapse, slurring her words she continued: “prescription drugs.”

“What has happened this week that is…” she said, trailing off and staring at reporters.

“I don’t want to say different,” she finally continued, before correcting herself.

The bizarre press conference ended leaving journalists with a lot more questions regarding Pelosi’s mental health.

Source: Every Day Conservative

TRUMP Did it AGAIN!They Are HEADING To MICHIGAN NOW!

When Candidate Donald Trump said we would be winning so much that we were going to get tired of winning he wasn’t kidding.

Today Fiat Chrysler announced it will immediately be moving production of heavy-duty Ram trucks from Mexico to Michigan. And on top of that paying bonuses to US workers in response to the passage of Trump tax reform late last year in where corporations and the middle class got a huge tax cut and the Obamacare Mandate was repealed.

Fiat Chrysler went on to confirm they will be investing over $1 billion dollars in its Warren Truck Assembly Plant. A plant that will be used to make the Ram Heavy Duty Truck starting in late 2020. That truck is currently made in Saltillo, Mexico, where workers will continue to make commercial vehicles to sell in the US and international markets.

Fiat Chrysler did also confirm that the Warren plant will add 2,500 new jobs to the dying Michigan economy. The car company also plans to pay $2,000 bonuses this spring to about 60,000 hourly and salaried US employees but confirmed Senior executives won’t getting the bonus. Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne stated the company had to tweak its manufacturing model in order to keep up with that he lauded as “improvement to the US business environment under the current administration.”

He added that part of this tweak is that employees should also share in the tax savings.

Top 3 Conservative Wins in the Tax Plan

Last night, the final Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was released, following the House-Senate conference that took the best ideas from both plans and made a better, more conservative bill. This is the first major tax reform in a generation.

It’s hard to choose, but here are the top three conservative wins:

1. It is a major tax cut for hardworking families.

Our plan lowers individual tax rates, making sure Americans get to keep more of their hard-earned money. It also nearly doubles the standard deduction, meaning that the “zero bracket,” which the federal government doesn’t tax at all, will be expanded to $12,000 for single filers and $24,000 for married couples. Our plan also doubles the Child Tax Credit from $1,000 to $2,000 for each child—bringing relief to folks raising families.

What do these updated provisions mean for real people? The average family of four making $73,000 a year will see a tax cut of $2,059. That goes a long way when budgets are tight. It could mean more money to save for children’s college, a reserve for an emergency, or a vacation at the beach for a week in the summer. Bottom line: This new tax code eliminates the carve-outs for special interests, prioritizing the American people over the well-connected.

2. It eliminates Obamacare’s individual mandate penalty tax:

This is the crux of Obamacare—the individual mandate makes it illegal for people not to purchase a health care plan, and the government levies a major fine if people make the choice not to purchase a plan. The individual mandate’s purpose is to make young people, who are generally healthier, bear the burden of health care costs in this country.

The consequences of the individual mandate are dire, especially because Obamacare has driven up the cost of health care across the country, making premiums so expensive that many folks cannot afford health care at all. Therefore, the individual mandate punishes people for making decisions that make the most sense for them and their family. The government has no place in unnecessary, burdensome mandates, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act does away with it, giving people much-needed relief and flexibility to buy the health care that’s right for them if they choose.

3. It opens up part of ANWR for energy development.

There is a section of non-wilderness federal land in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), located in Alaska, that is known to be abundant in oil reserves. Unfortunately, it has been previously banned for energy development, thanks to the insistence of special interests. This ban goes against the petitions of the Alaska delegation, which understands the benefits that oil drilling would bring to the state. If it becomes law, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will open this area up for energy exploration and development.

This would mean more energy developed here at home, instead of relying on other nations for our nation’s energy needs. Developing homegrown energy is always preferable, especially because some of these nations are hostile to the United States and our interests. It also means revenue of almost $1 billion in 10 years streaming into the United States Treasury, helping pay for the tax cut that Americans need and deserve. Developing this portion of ANWR also means thousands of good-paying jobs in Alaska and throughout the country. It would give the U.S. economy the boost that comes with major energy development.

Can someone please explain to me why the left hates this tax plan so much? It’s obvious it works for the middle class and corporations, while at the same time taxing the nuts in Hollywood who believe they should pay more taxes to make themselves feel better about the fact they are just a bunch of elitist overpaid and glorified pretenders.

Source: Freedom Daily
 

How The Clinton Foundation Turned Haiti Into A Sh*thole

In January 2015, a group of Haitians surrounded the New York offices of the Clinton Foundation. They chanted slogans, accusing Bill and Hillary Clinton of having robbed them of “billions of dollars.” Two months later, the Haitians were at it again, accusing the Clintons of duplicity, malfeasance, and theft. And in May 2015, they were back, this time outside New York’s Cipriani, where Bill Clinton received an award and collected a $500,000 check for his foundation. “Clinton, where’s the money?” the Haitian signs read. “In whose pockets?” Said Dhoud Andre of the Commission Against Dictatorship, “We are telling the world of the crimes that Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for in Haiti.”

Haitians demanding justice.

Haitians like Andre may sound a bit angry, but he and the protesters had good reason to be disgruntled. They had suffered a heavy blow from Mother Nature, and now it appeared that they were being battered again — this time by the Clintons. Their story goes back to 2010, when a massive 7.0 earthquake devastated the island, killing more than 200,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes, and leaving 1.5 million people destitute.

The devastating effect of the earthquake on a very poor nation provoked worldwide concern and inspired an outpouring of aid money intended to rebuild Haiti. Countries around the world, as well as private and philanthropic groups such as the Red Cross and the Salvation Army, provided some $10.5 billion in aid, with $3.9 billion of it coming from the United States.

Haitians such as Andre, however, noticed that very little of this aid money actually got to poor people in Haiti. Some projects championed by the Clintons, such as the building of industrial parks and posh hotels, cost a great deal of money and offered scarce benefits to the truly needy. Port-au-Prince was supposed to be rebuilt; it was never rebuilt. Projects aimed at creating jobs proved to be bitter disappointments. Haitian unemployment remained high, largely undented by the funds that were supposed to pour into the country. Famine and illness continued to devastate the island nation.

The Haitians were initially sympathetic to the Clintons. One may say they believed in the message of “hope and change.” With his customary overstatement, Bill told the media, “Wouldn’t it be great if they become the first wireless nation in the world? They could, I’m telling you, they really could.”

I don’t blame the Haitians for falling for it; Bill is one of the world’s greatest story-tellers. He has fooled people far more sophisticated than the poor Haitians. Over time, however, the Haitians wised up. Whatever their initial expectations, many saw that much of the aid money seems never to have reached its destination; rather, it disappeared along the way.

Where is the money?

Where did it go? It did not escape the attention of the Haitians that Bill Clinton was the designated UN representative for aid to Haiti. Following the earthquake, Bill Clinton had with media fanfare established the Haiti Reconstruction Fund. Meanwhile, his wife Hillary was the United States secretary of state. She was in charge of U.S. aid allocated to Haiti. Together the Clintons were the two most powerful people who controlled the flow of funds to Haiti from around the world.

The Haitian protesters noticed an interesting pattern involving the Clintons and the designation of how aid funds were used. They observed that a number of companies that received contracts in Haiti happened to be entities that made large donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Haitian contracts appeared less tailored to the needs of Haiti than to the needs of the companies that were performing the services. In sum, Haitian deals appeared to be a quid pro quo for filling the coffers of the Clintons.

For example, the Clinton Foundation selected Clayton Homes, a construction company owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, to build temporary shelters in Haiti. Buffett is an active member of the Clinton Global Initiative who has donated generously to the Clintons as well as the Clinton Foundation. The contract was supposed to be given through the normal United Nations bidding process, with the deal going to the lowest bidder who met the project’s standards. UN officials said, however, that the contract was never competitively bid for.

Clayton offered to build “hurricane-proof trailers” but what they actually delivered turned out to be a disaster. The trailers were structurally unsafe, with high levels of formaldehyde and insulation coming out of the walls. There were problems with mold and fumes. The stifling heat inside made Haitians sick and many of them abandoned the trailers because they were ill-constructed and unusable.

The Clintons also funneled $10 million in federal loans to a firm called InnoVida, headed by Clinton donor Claudio Osorio. Osorio had loaded its board with Clinton cronies, including longtime Clinton ally General Wesley Clark; Hillary’s 2008 finance director Jonathan Mantz; and Democratic fundraiser Chris Korge who has helped raise millions for the Clintons.

jkh24khj

Normally the loan approval process takes months or even years. But in this case, a government official wrote, “Former President Bill Clinton is personally in contact with the company to organize its logistical and support needs. And as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has made available State Department resources to assist with logistical arrangements.”

InnoVida had not even provided an independently audited financial report that is normally a requirement for such applications. This requirement, however, was waived. On the basis of the Clinton connection, InnoVida’s application was fast-tracked and approved in two weeks.

The company, however, defaulted on the loan and never built any houses. An investigation revealed that Osorio had diverted company funds to pay for his Miami Beach mansion, his Maserati, and his Colorado ski chalet. He pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering in 2013, and is currently serving a twelve-year prison term on fraud charges related to the loan.

Several Clinton cronies showed up with Bill to a 2011 Housing Expo that cost more than $2 million to stage. Bill Clinton said it would be a model for the construction of thousands of homes in Haiti. In reality, no homes have been built. A few dozen model units were constructed but even they have not been sold. Rather, they are now abandoned and have been taken over by squatters.

THE SCHOOLS THEY NEVER BUILT

USAID contracts to remove debris in Port-au-Prince went to a Washington-based company named CHF International. The company’s CEO David Weiss, a campaign contributor to Hillary in 2008, was deputy U.S. trade representative for North American Affairs during the Clinton administration. The corporate secretary of the board, Lauri Fitz-Pegado, served in a number of posts in the Clinton administration, including assistant secretary of commerce.The Clintons claim to have built schools in Haiti. But the New York Times discovered that when it comes to the Clintons, “built” is a term with a very loose interpretation. For example, the newspaper located a school featured in the Clinton Foundation annual report as “built through a Clinton Global Initiative Commitment to Action.” In reality, “The Clinton Foundation’s sole direct contribution to the school was a grant for an Earth Day celebration and tree-building activity.”

“The Clintons claim to have built schools in Haiti. But the New York Times discovered that when it comes to the Clintons, ‘built’ is a term with a very loose interpretation.”

USAID contracts also went to consulting firms such as New York–based Dalberg Global Development Advisors, which received a $1.5 million contract to identify relocation sites for Haitians. This company is an active participant and financial supporter of the Clinton Global Initiative. A later review by USAID’s inspector general found that Dalberg did a terrible job, naming uninhabitable mountains with steep ravines as possible sites for Haitian rebuilding.

Foreign governments and foreign companies got Haitian deals in exchange for bankrolling the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation lists the Brazilian construction firm OAS and the InterAmerican Development Bank (IDB) as donors that have given it between $1 billion and $5 billion.

The IDB receives funding from the State Department, and some of this funding was diverted to OAS for Haitian road-building contracts. Yet an IDB auditor, Mariela Antiga, complained that the contracts were padded with “excessive costs” to build roads “no one needed.” Antiga also alleged that IDB funds were going to a construction project on private land owned by former Haitian president Rene Preval — a Clinton buddy — and several of his cronies. For her efforts to expose corruption, Antiga was promptly instructed by the IDB to pack her bags and leave Haiti.

In 2011, the Clinton Foundation brokered a deal with Digicel, a cell-phone-service provider seeking to gain access to the Haitian market. The Clintons arranged to have Digicel receive millions in U.S. taxpayer money to provide mobile phones. The USAID Food for Peace program, which the State Department administered through Hillary aide Cheryl Mills, distributed Digicel phones free to Haitians.

Digicel didn’t just make money off the U.S. taxpayer; it also made money off the Haitians. When Haitians used the phones, either to make calls or transfer money, they paid Digicel for the service. Haitians using Digicel’s phones also became automatically enrolled in Digicel’s mobile program. By 2012, Digicel had taken over three-quarters of the cell-phone market in Haiti.

Digicel is owned by Denis O’Brien, a close friend of the Clintons. O’Brien secured three speaking engagements in his native Ireland that paid $200,000 apiece. These engagements occurred right at the time that Digicel was making its deal with the U.S. State Department. O’Brien has also donated lavishly to the Clinton Foundation, giving between $1 million and $5 million sometime in 2010–2011.

Maxine Waters Is Asked What Crime Specifically Trump Has Committed. Her Response Is Both Hilarious And Sad

Loudmouth Rep. Maxine Waters has reinvented herself as the bullhorn of the Democrats’ anti-Trump “resistance.”

Everywhere she goes, Waters can be heard shouting “Impeach 45!”

But, as many have pointed out, impeachment requires some very specific conditions to be met.

Specifically, the president needs to have committed certain actual crimes, and in a certain way.

But the facts and details, the actual laws governing this nation, don’t seem to concern this LAWMAKER.

At a recent rally, Waters insisted:

“Impeachment is about whatever the Congress says it is. There is no law that dictates impeachment. What the Constitution says is ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ and we define that.”

In other words, in Waters’ world, Congress can just impeach anyone it pleases, and make up the rules as it goes.

Law Newz explained that while that notion is somewhat accurate, Waters had grossly skewed the reality of how impeachment works:

The framers, as we all know, were hell-bent on making sure that the American president could not become tyrannical; a key facet to their planning was to give Congress the final word on whether the chief executive was carrying out his responsibilities with the requisite dignity befitting the office. Such an concept of impeachment may provide us significant discomfort in that it varies so profoundly from the criminal justice system, but that’s precisely the point. Impeachment is inherently a political process, not a criminal one. The numbers required for impeachment and conviction ensure that the process isn’t likely to oust a president who is merely unpopular; supermajorities aren’t easy to come by, and are inherent guards against arbitrary or capricious actions.

Trump’s been in office less than a year, and most of what Waters is bringing against him remains in the realm of far-fetched allegation and personal dislike.

“Arbitrary” would be an understatement for Waters’ efforts to impeach Trump.

Source: Conservative Post

Obama Is Running A Terrorist Training Camp Right Here In The USA

National Security Advisor Colonel Jason Gibbons tasked his team last week with finding out what was going on in Southeast California at 6K feet above sea-level. When Predator drones began returning pictures like the one above, his staff became alarmed.

Now, with evidence that a camp on a plateau between Mt. Marandy and Mt. Loshton is training “security specialists” for a company owned by Barack Obama, they’ve become downright suspicious. As a security company with a federal firearms permit to train with automatic weapons, all of the trainees have to be listed in a report filed with the ATF. That report lists four instructors and a dozen students, all with impeccable records.

What it doesn’t list is what the drone found: more than 500 men, most with beards and some form of “headdress” on, are training in the hills of California in plain clothes with automatic weapons. Not a single one of them is there legally. According to the California Secretary of State:

“NOS Inc is a reputable company with distinguished owners. Nobody is buying into the hype that Obama is a terrorist Muslim Commie Fascist. That’s for the Tea Partiers in the South to fantasize about. We won’t be investigating or issuing any warrants to search for what one aide thinks are people and 40 others think are shrubs.”

He’s obviously covering for his Democrat buddy Obama. The next step for Gibbons’ team will be to send federal agents to investigate what will most certainly be an empty camp by the time they get there:

“The Secretary’s statement was out of line and compromised a federal investigation. We may be back to square one.”

Nobody is publicizing this disaster. Obama may have yet again dodged a bullet.

Source: The Last Line Of Defense

OPRAH INELIGIBLE For PRESIDENT! Here’s What She Did!

Even on the Golden Globe awards event, the absurd liberals bashed President Donald Trump.

The most ironic moment occurred when Oprah Winfrey stepped on stage and gave a whole statement about sexual abuse and harassment in our country.

She probably forgot the allegations made against her.

Since always, Oprah is trying to portray herself as a caring woman who helps women in every way. That’s how she got so famous. She even made it clear that she wants to try her chances in the 2020 presidential elections. However, there is a new sex scandal that surfaced and probably destroyed every chance that she had. If she had any at all.

Despite her effort to show her self as a role model for women, especially for the liberals, it seems that she is nothing more than a supporter of sexual harassment. It was revealed that she actually helped Harvey Weinstein in his hunt for women who very sexually abused by him.

Last month, British actress Kadian Noble decided to come forward and share her terrible experience with Harvey. She explained that Oprah didn’t give her the advice to stay away from Weinstein, despite the fact that she knew about his intention. Oprah even encouraged her to speak to him about her career.

“I thought, obviously, this man has something amazing in store for me,” Noble stated. Apparently, both of them “played” her.

Noble is just one of the many women who came forward and gave their stories about Weinstein. To know that he was supported by Oprah denies every opinion that any person has about her. She can’t be supported in any way and to run for the President of the United States is despicable.

Source: Freedom Daily, Conservative Forever
 

Guam’s Governor Sends Shock Message to Trump, Media Stunned!

There are still people who are not confident enough with President Trump, despite the many accomplishments.

However, there are many more people who are starting to understand that he can fix any issue, even the one with North Korea.

Guam’s Governor Eddie Baza Calvo has shown his total support.

Calvo started by explaining: “As the governor of Guam representing the people of Guam and as an American citizen, I have never felt more safe or confident than with you at the helm. So, with all the criticism going on over there from a guy that’s being targeted, we need a president like you. So I’m just so thankful. I’m glad you’re holding the helm, sir.”

Currently, Guam is in danger from North Korea. Nonetheless, Calvo believes in Trump and said that he and his country are with him “1,000 percent.”

President Trump showed support for Guam by saying: “We’re going to do a great job for you, don’t worry about a thing. They should’ve had me in years ago…That was the time. And frankly, you could’ve said that for the last three presidents.”

“All over the world, they’re talking about Guam…Tourism is going to go up, like, tenfold…It just looks like a beautiful place,” Trump addressed to the governor.

Trump is certain that the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un won’t proceed with his threats. Trump said: “He’s not going to go around threatening Guam. And he’s not going to threaten the United States. And he’s not going to threaten Japan. And he’s not going to threaten South Korea.”
data-href=”https://www.facebook.com/eddiebazacalvo/videos/1556523924414870/” data-width=”740″>
For these reasons, Calvo decided to support Trump and show respect towards him. Actually, every American needs to give him full support. Trump is wise enough to know how to proceed with a danger like this. No one should question his power and knowledge.

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

Source: Conservative Folks

BREATH-TAKING! 15 Photos Of First Lady Melania Trump That Will Make You Proud Of Her

In such a short time, the First Lady Melania Trump has shown that she truly owns the position.

She is a caring woman who has class and attitude.

Many people follow her clothing and fashion and she never fails to amaze the surrounding crowd.

President Donald Trump and his wife Melania just started their second trip to meet with foreign leaders all around the world. During their first trip, Trump showed that he is the true President of the United States.

And once again, Melania Trump thrilled everyone with her fashion. Many people were amazed her by style and glamour.

Prior to departing for her next destination, Warsaw Poland and Hamburg, Germany for the G20 Summit, Melania chose the perfect outfit. According to the report from Conservative Fighters, Melania wore “a pair of pale pink cropped wide-leg windowpane Valentino trousers, along with a black, long-sleeve knit sweater.” The Valentino pants that she wore, “retail for $1,790,” as what Breitbart reported.

When she arrived at her destination, in Warsaw, she wore a green suede Diane Von Furstenberg coat. She completed her clothing with a graphic Diane Von Furstenberg Arago silk scarf, which sells for $89.

While defending the West with Donald, she wore a bright sleeveless decoupage midi dress from the Spanish designer Delpozo. It was created from a scuba-knit and featured a design of magenta, orange and blue. She wore purple Manolo Blahnik stilettos.

When she attended the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Melania was clothed with a white 1920s-inspired Michael Kors frock completed with “white pointed-toe Christian Louboutin stilettos.”

Of course, the liberals are always trying to find a terrible look from the First Lady, but she never gives them that satisfaction. She is always perfectly dressed and has a great behavior. As it looks for the First Lady of the United States and the wife of the President himself.

Both, Donald and Melania have shown great characteristics and no one can deny that.

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

Featured Image Source. H/T: Conservative Tribune, Conservative Forever
 

 

$4 Million And 2 Dead Bodies Found In Democrat Mayor’s Storage Unit

Moyor Stephen “Stormin’” Foreman of Goose Rapids, Missouri has been placed on the FBI’s most wanted list after a storage locker he apparently forgot to pay for was auctioned off — complete with $4 million in cash and 2 dead bodies.

Special Agent Hendrick Slurryman explained that it was a clerical error that caused the Mayor, a Democrat, to tuck tail and run:

“Steve Foreman would have never even been a suspect in the crimes we found evidence of in that locker. The bodies and money trace back to an armored car robbery in Southeast New Mexico. He had the unit on an autopay contract but his credit card expired and due to a juxtoposed number…he never got the notice in the mail.”

According to his secretary, John Lewis Prager, he first he heard of it was when it came over the police scanner in the Mayor’s office. “He suddenly had to go,” said Prager, visibly upset, “It’s the last time I’ve seen or heard from him. I’m guessing he knew what was about to happen and went to some other evil storage locker to cash out and escape.”

The FBI thinks Prager is right. Foreman reportedly has more than a dozen storage units spread across Missouri and possibly hundreds around the country. He was spotted on surveillance cameras in Hamilton leaving a unit with a bag from an armored car:

A bag that size could contain millions in $100 bills or bearer bonds. The FBI also suspects that Foreman has fake passports and various pre-planned escape routes. “Finding him won’t be easy,” said Slurryman, “but we won’t stop until we do.”

The mayor’s job in Goose Rapids will revert to Foreman’s Deputy Mayor.

According to Ladies Of Liberty