Reality Hits Millennials – Too Many Tattoos & Piercings Equals NO JOB

Dr. Harris Sterman is all for young people expressing their individuality. But just how many piercings can you put into one ear, anyway?

“Some people get really carried away,” says Sterman, chief of plastic surgery at Holy Name Medical Center in Teaneck. The multiple holes are one thing. But then there’s the many large and heavy objects hung from all those holes — and we’re not just talking regular old diamond stud earrings or tiny crucifixes anymore — before the poor ear is literally stretched to its outermost limits.

Call it a strange sign of the times. Some doctors, like Sterman, say they are noticing more and more millennials coming in because their ears have become deformed from overpiercing and need reconstructive surgery.

And it’s not just ear piercing. Many are seeking to reverse the impulsive, perhaps keg-fueled decisions of their not-quite-lost youths. That tongue piercing, that bone through the nose, that conspicuously placed tattoo you got in college may not go over so big now in a job interview, or in the board room.

It’s time to conform to the real world.

“There has been an influx of people, millennials in particular, who have a lot of body piercings — mainly facial piercings — that they are looking to change,” says Dr. Laurence Milgrim, a board-certified facial plastic surgeon in Teaneck. “These are large earring holes, larger than the usual stud hole. When the earlobe and other parts of their bodies are expanded, they have trouble in the classic work force. Nose piercings, ear piercings … and tattoo removal, especially on the neck, where it’s noticeable, has become popular.”

An estimated 36 percent of Americans have at least one piercing somewhere other than an earlobe, according to a 2012 Pew Research study. Other research suggests the figure is as high as 56 percent for those between 17 and 25, reports North Jersey.

In most cases, the ravaged earlobe, the mutilated upper-ear cartilage, the messed-up tongue piercing and even the most elaborate tattoo can be removed or fixed in one or more visits.

“As plastic surgeons, we do fix them, and we can do a very nice job. I have had people with massively stretched-out ear lobes and now, you would not even be able to tell,” says Dr. Daniel Maman, a board-certified plastic surgeon at 740 Park Plastic Surgery in Manhattan. “It depends. But I have fixed some severe deformities under a local anesthesia and here in the office.”

Damage done

Sterman notes that years of wearing even one set of earrings can eventually lead to a tearing of the earlobes in any age group. But millennials tend to cut through more tissue, faster, simply by pushing the fashion envelope. “When you have multiple earrings and they are close together, the holes can weaken the tissue faster and the holes merge together,” he says.

He also pointed to the popularity of so-called gauge earrings among millennials, which are especially disfiguring in the long-run. “They make an opening, and they put in a disk. So when you take it out, your earlobes almost look like strings of spaghetti, all stretched out. If you take it out, you have this kind of loop,” he says.

Maman said the damage can be more serious when people pierce the upper ear. “Once you go above the earlobe, you are penetrating the cartilage. You make a permanent hole. Cartilage does not grow back or regenerate.” This can lead to chondritis, he says, an infection in the cartilage.

“Have you ever seen the wrestler with the cauliflower ears? The result would be the same,” Maman says, “There is plastic surgery for it, and we can fix it to the best of our ability. But the more severe the damage, the less you can fix it.”

But with or without deformity, many millennials simply want things removed or filled in because they are entering a new, more conservative phase of life. And well they should, says Eugene Gentile, director of the Undergraduate Career Management Office at Rutgers Business School in New Brunswick.

“We tell people take your nose ring out. But then you’re looking at that great big hole,” says Gentile, who teaches classes and seminars on how to present yourself in interviews and in the business world. “One thing I teach is when you’re on an interview, you want a person focusing on your eyes and your mouth. Not to be distracted by whatever adornment you have on your body.

“A lot of things that are great for the club are not great for the interview,” he adds. “One of the things we teach is wear a very conservative suit. And I get push-back on that. ‘Do you want us all to look the same? You told us to differentiate ourselves.’ It sounds contradictory, but I want a dark suit and a light shirt or blouse so that people are looking at your face and listening to what you say. The tattoo doesn’t help. It is incredibly distracting.”

“I had a guy who wanted to join the military, and because he had this gauge deformity, he felt he had to get it fixed,” Sterman says. “You are allowed certain tattoos, but things are still very strict. He had this huge loop for an earlobe.”

Several options available

There are a few ways to fix the problem.

“We reconstruct the earlobe with tissue surrounding it, or from other areas,” says Milgrim. Holes are filled in and excess stretched skin is removed.

Sterman said he has a slightly different method. By employing what is known as the lap-joint technique, he says, “you’re creating right angle turns in the scar, so this way when it heals, it doesn’t cause notching. It ends up taking an extra 10 to 15 minutes. Some insurance covers it. The earlobe ends up having a beautiful curvature to it,” Sterman says, whereas under the standard treatment method, a small cleft can be left in the lobe.

As for tattoos, says Milgrim, “removals over the years have gotten so much better. We have better lasers, and today, the removal is not as noticeable as it used to be,” he says, noting that in the past, remnants of an old tattoo would sometimes be visible.

“The tattoos are removed over multiple sessions,” Mi;grim says. “Some of the colors can be very hard to get out because of the depth of the color. Reds are the hardest.”.

“I had a young woman who came in who had this bizarre tattoo on her shoulder blade, who grew up, got a real job in the corporate world, and had to go to corporate events,” Sterman says. “She ended up getting laser treatments to have it removed. … With tattoos, each color almost needs a different laser. In order to treat this, you need very expensive equipment. It’s multiple treatments. And it can be expensive, too.”

Milgrim says ear reconstruction generally costs between $1,000 and $2,000, while tattoo removal is anywhere from $500 to $1,500.


Supreme Court Allows Christian-Owned Mississippi Businesses To Refuse Service To LGBT’s

Mississippi’s Republican-backed religious rights law has been allowed to stand, proving to be a major setback for the militant anti-heterosexual gay supremacist movement, activists say. The law enables business and government employees to refuse service to members of the LGBT community based on religious beliefs.

The United States Supreme Court on Monday ended the first legal challenge to a Republican-backed Mississippi law that permits businesses and government employees to refuse to serve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people because of their religious beliefs.

The Supreme Court justices left in place a June ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals that the plaintiffs – same-sex couples, civil rights advocates including the head of the state NAACP chapter, a church and others – did not have legal standing to bring the lawsuit.

The law, passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Phillip Bryant with the backing of conservative Christian activists, has not yet been implemented and more legal challenges are expected, according to gay rights lawyers, reports Fox News.

“We will keep fighting in Mississippi until we overturn this harmful law, and in any state where antigay legislators pass laws to roll back LGBT civil rights,” said Beth Littrell, a lawyer with gay rights group Lambda Legal.

The 2016 law was passed in the aftermath of the US Supreme Court’s landmark 2015 ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.

Supporters call it a religious liberty law that protects the sincerely held religious beliefs and moral convictions of individuals and businesses. Opponents said it authorizes discrimination against LGBT people in violation of the US Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection under the law and the separation of church and state. What they forget is there is actually nothing in the Constitution about the separation of church and state, that is a court ruling.

Conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom is helping the state defend the law.

“Good laws like Mississippi’s protect freedom and harm no one,” said Kevin Theriot, one of the group’s lawyers.

Mississippi’s law was one of a series of measures proposed in socially conservative, Republican-dominated states that gay rights advocates viewed as an attempt to undermine the high court’s gay marriage ruling.

The law, called the Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, protects the beliefs that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, sex outside such a marriage is improper and gender is determined by anatomy and genetics at birth and cannot change.

Among other things, the measure lets businesses refuse to provide marriage-related services to same-sex couples and allows judges, magistrates and justices of the peace to refuse to perform same-sex weddings.

The measure was blocked in 2016 by a Mississippi-based federal judge who said it unconstitutionally allowed “arbitrary discrimination” against LGBT people and unmarried people. The 5th Circuit overturned that ruling.


Trailer Trash Tramp Miley Cyrus Babbles Incoherently About Gun Control

In the wake of the heinous Texas church attack, pop mega-star, and trailer trash tramp Miley Cyrus attacked President Trump’s stance against more gun control and demanded the passage of new gun laws.

The manly-voiced Voice coach whined in an Instagram post on Monday how a “WHITE AMERICAN MAN!” had perpetrated another mass shooting, revealing that she’s “disgusted” and “embarrassed” by her country for not passing more gun laws.

Her push comes in spite of the fact that the attacker passed a background check for his rifle and in spite of President Trump’s assertion that new gun laws would do more harm than good.

Cyrus slammed Trump and stood against his contention that the Sutherland Springs’ attack was a mental illness issue, rather than a gun issue, writing on Instagram: “I’d like to believe that EVERY person who takes the life of another being is ‘mentally ill. It’s hard to conceptualize that a sane human could commit such a hideous crime. BUT I am sorry Donald Trump this absolutely is a ‘GUNS SITUATION.’”

My dreams have become nightmares & those nightmares , reality … This isn't fair , this isn't right , this isn't just , this isn't human! This is a TERRORIST act by a WHITE AMERICAN MAN! I am heartbroken & embarrassed. Mortified by our country & its shitty system , lack of control/laws! This does NOT HAVE or NEED to happen! It's devastatingly disgusting! This is exactly why the lyrics of Bad Mood were so important for me to share on a major platform. I wanted to bring awareness to the fact that everyday we are waking up to more terrifyingly painful information that makes it nearly impossible to feel optimistic that things are going to change! They say it gets worst before it gets better in some cases & I wish on every star that this is the worst of it! I continue to be hopeful that enough is enough and the eyes of the ignorant will open and realize that (gun) VIOLENCE has to stop! This assholes Facebook profile photo was a fucking riffle ! "I don't know how much more it can take!" #FuckGuns #FuckViolence 🚫💔🚫💔 My love is with you TX!

A post shared by Miley Cyrus (@mileycyrus) on

It’s likely she doesn’t recognize it as a mental health issue, because Miley herself is bat-shit crazy.

Trailer Trash Tramp Miley Cyrus Babbles Incoherently About Gun Control #o4a #guns
November 12, 2017 5:19 pm by Founder
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Print this pageEmail this to someone
Mr Americana, Overpasses News Desk
November 12th, 2017

In the wake of the heinous Texas church attack, pop mega-star, and trailer trash tramp Miley Cyrus attacked President Trump’s stance against more gun control and demanded the passage of new gun laws.

The manly-voiced Voice coach whined in an Instagram post on Monday how a “WHITE AMERICAN MAN!” had perpetrated another mass shooting, revealing that she’s “disgusted” and “embarrassed” by her country for not passing more gun laws.

Her push comes in spite of the fact that the attacker passed a background check for his rifle and in spite of President Trump’s assertion that new gun laws would do more harm than good.

Cyrus slammed Trump and stood against his contention that the Sutherland Springs’ attack was a mental illness issue, rather than a gun issue, writing on Instagram: “I’d like to believe that EVERY person who takes the life of another being is ‘mentally ill. It’s hard to conceptualize that a sane human could commit such a hideous crime. BUT I am sorry Donald Trump this absolutely is a ‘GUNS SITUATION.’”

It’s likely she doesn’t recognize it as a mental health issue, because Miley herself is bat-shit crazy.

The problem with Cyrus’ arguments is that they are theoretical; they deal with human nature via the progressive prism that sees the possibility of utopia here on earth.

In reality, such utopia is not possible. Rather, the actions of a bad guy are only kept in check by good guys who can shoot back.

In short, Miley Cyrus doesn’t have a clue what she’s talking about. As if anyone with an ounce of sense would take anything she says seriously?

President Trump recognizes this, which is why he views gun control as dangerous because it limits the ability of law-abiding citizens to acquire the guns they need for self-defense. In the case of the Sutherland Springs, Texas, attack, it might have prevented Stephen Willeford from possessing the gun he needed to stop the church attacker.

As Trump astutely observed, “[With more gun control] you might not have had that very brave person who happened to have a gun or a rifle in his truck, go out and shoot [the attacker], and hit him, neutralize him”, reports Breitbart.

Should the Texas church attacker, Devin Kelley, have been able to buy a gun? Not based on his 2012 arrest and subsequent conviction. But the Air Force somehow fumbled reporting his record to the National Instant Criminal Background Check system (NICS). So the need is not for new laws or new systems, but for full compliance — including information sharing — with the system that is already in place.

After taking heat from several social media users over her “white American man” comment, Cyrus posted another picture to Instagram of her “favorite WHITE AMERICAN MALES” — including her father, Billy Ray Cyrus, and her two brothers.


Lindsey Graham to Americans: ‘Your Country Does Not Belong to You – It Belongs to?

According to amnesty advocate Sen. Lindsey Graham, America is not owned by Americans and their children but is instead held by people all over the globe.

“I’ve always believed that America is an idea [which is] not defined by its people but by its ideals,” Graham said in a press statement January 12 which sought to criticise President Donald Trump for describing some foreign countries as less pleasant than America, or as “shitholes.”

Graham continued:

The American ideal is embraced by people all over the globe. It was best said a long time ago, E Pluribus Unum – Out of Many, One. Diversity has always been our strength, not our weakness. In reforming immigration we cannot lose these American Ideals.

In his pro-immigration statement, Graham also argued that government-imposed civic variety — “diversity” — is an American ideal that is ensured by mass-immigration, Breitbart reports.

In contrast, President Donald Trump won the 2016 election because voters shared his frequently expressed favoritism towards his own country and his fellow citizens. In his inauguration speech, Trump declared:

This is your day. This is your celebration. And this, the United States of America, is your country. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.

The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer. Everyone is listening to you now. You came by the tens of millions to become part of a historic movement the likes of which the world has never seen before.

At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction: that a nation exists to serve its citizens. Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves. These are the just and reasonable demands of a righteous public.

Polls show that Trump’s American-first immigration policy is very popular. For example, a December poll of likely 2018 voters shows two-to-one voter support for Trump’s pro-American immigration policies, and a lopsided four-to-one opposition against the cheap-labor, mass-immigration, economic policy pushed by bipartisan establishment-backed D.C. interest-groups.

The American people voted for President Donald Trump because we believe in America first, strong borders and strong immigration policies. We believe in lawful immigration and expect our elected officials, like Sen. Lindsey Graham, to adhere to, and enforce the Laws of the Constitution – especially those pertaining to immigration.

…It Belongs to the World?

Read the full story here.



Trump Lays Foundation To Seize Assets & Arrest George Soros & MANY MORE

President Trump signs Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption, otherwise known as the foundation to seize assets of corrupt politicians.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


Trump Just Delivered Some Bad News To Entitled Welfare Leeches Who Refuse To Get A Job

After years of bleeding the taxpayers dry with Obama-phones, unlimited benefits, and bottomless food stamps, welfare leeches who refuse to pull their own weight aren’t going to like what President Donald Trump just announced. You’re going to love this.

While Barack Obama will always be remembered as the president who illegally ran guns to drug cartels, empowered a nuclear Iran, and freed a record number of Islamic terrorists, his economic legacy is just as devastating. Like a preteen garnering votes for class president, the former community organizer-in-chief injected taxpayer funds into failed social programs in a bid to secure votes from the perpetually dependent, impoverished, Democrat-run ghettos.

Although 8 years of frivolous spending, terrible deals, and surmounting debt were left to Trump, the “America first” businessman is rescinding Obama mandates faster than the mainstream media can spin a story. However, Trump’s latest repeal is going to have the welfare leeches and career druggies creeping out of the woodwork like never before.

Breitbart reports that the Trump administration has officially unveiled a new regulation which will require drug testing for unemployment benefit recipients as well as a stipulation that they must prove they are “job-ready from day one.” In his signing of the Congressional Review Act (CRA), President Trump was able to repeal an Obama-era mandate that prevented states from drug testing unemployment benefit applicants.

House Ways and Means chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) proposed the repeal, which was sponsored by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), explaining that the regulation will crack down on both those who rely on welfare while abusing narcotics that prevent them from obtaining gainful employment as well as those who have no intention of re-entering the workforce.

“President Trump just signed into law my bill that abolishes an Obama-era rule. After five years of battling with the Obama Department of Labor, states like Texas will now be allowed to drug test folks on unemployment to ensure they are job-ready from day one. This is a win for families, workers, job creators, and local economies,” Brady explained.

Although American unemployment is holding at a 17-year record low, the Trump administration’s regulation will undoubtedly tighten up restrictions for such welfare to ensure that it is being utilized as a boost to enter the workforce instead of an incentive to continue to remain jobless.

Previously, Republicans confirmed that the 2016 unemployment mandate only allowed the requirement for jobless Americans to submit drug testing if they were in positions that commonly required it, such as commercial and public transit drivers, airline pilots and crew members, and jobs that require the person to carry a firearm. However, the new regulation will allow states to drug test a wider range of applicants who seek unemployment benefits. Those who fail testing will be subjected to rejection or termination of their welfare.

Strategic Services on Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation President Doug Holmes reiterated that if applicants want benefits, they must be sober and actively seeking out employment, according to The Hill.

“This is an insurance program, it’s not public assistance,” he said. “An individual has to be available and able to work. If they’re not available and able to work, week by week by week, then they don’t meet the requirements to be paid unemployment compensation benefits. If an individual has a significant problem that renders him or her unavailable to work, the appropriate response is to refer them to a place to get help. They should not be paid unemployment benefits.”

Until Trump’s repeal, only 3 states refuted Obama’s mandate to allow drug testing for their unemployment insurance program — Texas, Mississippi, and Wisconsin. Fortunately, all 50 states will be empowered to implement the regulation as early as June, according to the Labor Department.

Welfare was never intended to be an incentive for laziness or lawlessness. On the contrary, these taxpayer benefits were always meant to serve as a springboard for the unfortunate to get back on their feet again.

For 2 terms, former President Barack Obama showed the American people that he cared much more for the welfare abusers, Gitmo terrorists, illegal aliens, and elite political crooks rather than the hard-working citizens he was elected to represent. Now, we have a leader who not only refuses to bow to our global enemies but seeks to empower our nation to reach the level of progress and prosperity it deserves.

Source: Symbol Of Law

Robert De Niro Just Busted In Disgusting Act After Calling Trump A ‘Low Life’ – His Acting Career Is OVER

It was not that long ago that WikiLeaks dropped the Podesta emails which depicted pedophilia in our very own government. Of course, the mainstream media has done its best to sweep this disgusting crime under the rug. However, there are those out there who are determined to root out these perverts hiding in our government and the entertainment industry. Over the last few weeks, new explosive allegations have emerged that point to a circle of high-powered executives and actors engaged in pedophilia and sexual assault.

Harvey Weinstein, an influential film producer, and Kevin Spacey, an Oscar-winning actor, have both been fingered as perpetrators in this sick circle. Now, Robert De Niro another member of Hollywood royalty was just discovered using the services of an international prostitution ring, but this sex ring has an even darker underbelly that will shock everyone.

During the presidential election, the liberal media and Hollywood elites continually based Donald Trump as a “low-life” sexual predator. The allegations stemmed from leaked audio tapes from 2005, of Trump in a locker room speaking crassly to washed-up actor Billy Bush. Of course, the conversation was taken out of context, but that did not stop Robert De Niro from using that audio to blast President Trump as a sexual predator.

Now, De Niro has been caught in a scandal that will not quickly be swept under the rug since the acclaimed actor was caught employing the services of a prostitution ring known to hire underaged children for wealthy, high-powered clients.

According to court documents, John Lichfield, a journalist who works for London’s Independent revealed that the prostitution agency routinely entrapped underage girls as young as 15-years-old, and forced them to have sex with Hollywood’s rich and powerful.

The court documents read like a trashy sex novel, filled with movie stars, high-ranking foreign dignitaries, arms deals, and politicians from the United States. Of course, the mainstream media did all that they could to hide this explosive story and protect Robert De Niro from the damaging discovery.

After discovering the court documents, John Lichfield wrote, “Six people are charged with the running of an international prostitution ring, whose call-girls entertained the actor Robert De Niro, the former tennis player, Wojtek Fibak, two senior (but unnamed) French politicians and several Gulf princes. The agency specialised in tricking, or trapping, star-struck teenage girls into selling their bodies with the promise of careers as models or actresses.”

This horrific discovery of sexual perversion was terrible enough, but the connection between De Niro and sexual predator Harvey Weinstein is even worse. According to sources, the two men were good friends and were often photographed together, and Weinstein frequented De Niro’s exclusive Manhattan restaurant, Tribeca Grill.

The swanky eatery was known as a “luxe magnet for celebrity seekers,” and Weinstein was often found there luring his victims with promises of fame and fortune before sexually assaulting them.

A former employee of De Niro’s at Tribeca Grill opened up to the New York Post about what it was like working in Robert De Niro’s world. The waitress revealed that while De Niro fawned over Harvey Weinstein, catering to his every whim, the Hollywood producer would treat her and her colleagues like human garbage.

“Harvey Weinstein was every bit the sleazy Hollywood caricature recent reports have made him out to be. When I was working as a waitress, I watched numerous times as a string of young women — some seemingly no older than 21 — entered the restaurant for long, flirty dinners with him, even though he was married with five children.

“These women were all the same: vaguely European, always beautiful, stylishly dressed, and totally out of place next to someone like him.

“The ritual for his rendezvous was very firm. Champagne, caviar, and an unspoken rule that Weinstein and his date not be disturbed. The pair would sit close, whispering and touching each other suggestively. After dining, Weinstein and the woman would often disappear for a while, exiting the restaurant through a side door.”

When President Trump said that he was going to drain the swamp, it did not just apply to crooked politicians, in the government. Trump is intent on busting human trafficking rings and the people who prey on innocent children for their nasty sexual pleasure. Earlier this year, President Trump announced a federal investigation into the elite pedophile scandal that has gripped our nation.

After learning of yet another dominant Hollywood individual being embroiled in a sex scandal, it makes sense why these actors, producers, and politicians are scared of President Donald Trump.

African Immigrant Has One Question For Liberals Erupting Over Trump’s ‘Shithole’ Comment

The mainstream media has relentlessly attacked President Donald Trump over a rumor that he called certain third-world nations “shitholes.” However, an African immigrant from one of these countries has interrupted the onslaught to ask liberals one brilliant question concerning their outrage.

On Thursday, U.S. lawmakers leaked to the press that President Donald Trump had made unsavory comments about some of the world’s most economically destitute and politically ravaged nations, allegedly asking, “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” Lawmakers claim that Trump named Haiti, El Salvador, and African countries that produce a large number of immigrants to the U.S. to prove his point.

Immediately, liberals and the mainstream media purported this unfounded allegation as indisputable fact, once again triggering the left’s patent political meltdown. However, just as the MSM and its easily-swayed audience members launched their vicious attack on Trump, one African immigrant has raised a question to these outraged leftists that unquestionably deserves an answer.

As a Nigerian immigrant to the U.S. and graduate of Georgia Military College, Chibuzo Ezeani has worthier insight and opinion on President Donald Trump’s recent alleged comments than any social justice warrior. Just after hearing the mainstream media perpetuate the rumor that Trump called African nations like his home country “shitholes,” Ezeani took to Facebook to ask the offended virtue-signaling leftists a brilliant question.

“If African countries are not shithole countries, why then should we be struggling to run away from them into European, Asian, and American countries respectively?” he asked.

Ezeani explained that he doesn’t “feel a bit offended by” Trump’s supposed comment and instead proceeded to educate ignorant liberals and the left-leaning MSM. Along with agreeing with Trump, Ezeani blamed African leaders for “allowing African countries to be such shithole countries,” and whose policies lead to “Africans selling out whatever belongings” they have and “running to western embassies in their various countries to beg for visas.”

Furthermore, Ezeani thanked Trump for having the “guts to say” what most people are thinking, adding that if his words aren’t accurate, “we Africans should not be running away from our continent to the Western world.”

Having left Nigeria for a better life in America, Chibuzo Ezeani understands firsthand just how devastated these countries are and why immigrants are flocking to our shores. Aside from applauding President Donald Trump’s politically incorrect yet truthful talk, Ezeani turned his focus to liberals, chastising them for their hypocritical condemnation and ingratitude of such a wonderful nation and leader.

“President Trump can work to make America great again, and that is a positive thing and nothing wrong with that,” he wrote in a follow-up post. “But why not our African leaders work to make African continent great again? Why can’t the Nigerian leaders say the same thing as Trump had said and work to make Nigeria nation great again? Why can’t the Black leaders in America work to make the black neighborhoods great again?”

Again, Ezeani called on those feigning misplaced outrage over Trump’s alleged comments to question why people across the globe are dying to get into the U.S. if their countries are so magnificent and America is such a miserable place for foreigners.

“Can we for once ask ourselves why we the African people keep running away from our own countries into the western countries to live despite the fact that most of our countries have wealth of mineral resources?” Ezeani once again asked. “Why must we keep on living in the white people’s countries if we have our own countries? All happened because our African leaders are very cruel, self-centered, shameless, treacherous, and very stupid. I like how Trump usually calling spade a spade, many others believed and agreed the same, but can’t just say it as is.”

Ezeani then confirmed the alleged comment, arguing that many of the countries Trump’s critics are defending are “worse than shitholes” thanks to the “foolishness of their various corrupt leaders.” Ezeani demanded to know who we are supposed to blame, “the president of the United States who boldly called them out for what they are or the African countries’ leaders who are so corrupt that they don’t give a damn?”

Although they’ve done nothing to help minorities do better for themselves, liberal hypocrites are ever ready to censure anyone who suggests that America is great. In fact, it is because of our exceptional values and freedoms that people around the world are risking their lives to come here. Of course, if these outraged liberals think these countries are so much better, perhaps they’d rather go live in them instead of virtue signaling from the comfort and safety of their computer screen.

Source: Mad World News

Muslims Call Mayor ‘Anti-Muslim’ For Banning Halal, He Shuts Them Up In 2 Brilliant Words

After a mayor banned halal, Muslims labeled him “Islamophobic” in an attempt to get him to cave on his decision. However, instead of submitting to political correctness, the clever mayor offered 2 brilliant words that immediately shut them up.

Europe continues to commit cultural suicide by admitting a ceaseless flood of mostly Muslim male migrants. When faced with legitimate examination and criticism of Islam’s fundamentals, Muslims and their liberal allies avoid meaningful debate at all costs, attacking their opponents with ad hominem name-calling and accusations of bigotry.

Disturbingly, many who’ve stood up against Islam’s war on Western values and freedoms fall silent when faced with the left’s incessant excoriation, beaten down by accusations of mythical “Islamophobia.” Fortunately, there are still a few bold patriots who not only refuse to back down amid the criticism, they’ve also learned to fight fire with fire.

After banning pork-free halal meals in schools, which were being offered to appease the demands of the Muslim minority, Beaucaire Mayor Julien Sanchez was immediately attacked by the Islamic community and their useful liberal idiots. The French official was soon labeled Islamophobic and “anti-Muslim” for refusing to force schools to change their entire menu to suit the Islamic compulsion for halal meals. Unfortunately for them, they picked the wrong infidel.

According to the Express, when 34-year-old Beaucaire Mayor Julien Sanchez heard that Muslims and liberals were accusing him of being “anti-Muslim” for rejecting their demands for halal school lunches, he cleverly turned their argument against them, alleging that they “are anti-Republican” in reference to their rejection of the Republic of France’s values and laws.

The young but incredibly brilliant mayor officially abolished his liberal predecessor’s submissive legislation, which required all schools to abstain from serving pork as well as offer meat that has been barbarically slaughtered in accordance with halal standards.

Mr Sanchez, told a local daily when announcing the new menu policy last month, said, “Pork-free substitution meals are anti-Republican.”

He said, “If you defend the values of the Republic and fight against communitarianism you’re branded an Islamophobe, which I am not. I’m not scared of anyone but I’m also not looking to stigmatise anyone. What’s wrong with pork? If it was a medical issue then I could understand, but the issue we’re dealing with here is religious, not medical… And religion has no place in schools.”

Expectedly, ignorant liberals continued to shill for the estimated 150 Muslim students whose families demanded halal, alleging that the decision would also affect Jewish students, the Daily Mail reports. However, they simply couldn’t argue his position that Muslims are being anti-Western, choosing to avoid his accusation altogether.

Marlene Schiappa told BFM TV the decision was “a typical example of someone brandishing secularism as an anti-Muslim political weapon, or anti-Jewish for that matter.”

The opposition leader in Beaucaire, Laure Cordelet, called it “an attack on the rights of children” which “stigmatises the Maghreb (north African) community and can in no way be justified in the name of secularism.”

Of course, Muslims are threatening to protest Mayor Julien Sanchez’s decision, demanding their minority rights, which their own religious law denies religious minorities. Still, Sanchez isn’t backing down and maintains that the Muslim minority want to live in France and have their foreign law too, which he will not recognize.

Thankfully, this mayor is standing strong against the tiny yet powerful Muslim minority’s attempt to impose Sharia law restrictions on the masses. It always begins the same — when Muslims are the minority, they whine about discrimination and demand their minority rights, but when they are the majority, there are no minority rights. Sharia law was not intended for only Muslims but for all mankind, as the Quran commands Muslims to establish it in every nation on earth.

Mayor Sanchez knows that although Muslims begin with small demands like halal meat, prayer breaks, or the right to wear the veil, these compulsions are just as required by Islamic law as more violent and oppressive ones. For example, Quran 33:59 commands men to order women to cover themselves, while 4:34 prescribes physical beatings for women who disobey their husbands. More disturbingly, 5:33 prescribes crucifixion for anyone insulting Islam and its tenents, while 9:29 commands Muslims to war with unbelievers until they have overthrown manmade law and established Sharia law.

Mayor Julien Sanchez is refusing to bow to political correctness and Sharia law in order to protect his people, culture, and freedoms. He is a beacon of hope in Europe as many countries are allowing the Muslim minority to slowly transform their nations into the same oppressed wastelands that their new guests claim to have fled.

Source: Mad World News

2 Million Rounds Of Ammo That ‘Went Missing’ Under Obama Turns Up In Enemy Hands

According to an insider report from the office of the Quartermaster at the Pentagon, the 2 million rounds of ammunition that “went missing” during Obama’s reign of terror were seized by US forces in Afghanistan and have been returned to the military inventory.

Brig. General George Mason’s assistant Chief of Staff all but confirmed the report, saying that the matter has been turned over to those in charge of accountability. She hinted that this is exactly the kind of thing that could end up before Congress:

“This was a huge violation of the public trust, not to mention an incredibly bold theft from the US taxpayer. Sourcres say the Taliban paid nearly a dollar a round. Someone in Obama’s circle pocketed that money.”

LLOD correspondent Skip Tetheluda contacted Congressman Trey Gowdy’s office, who would not confirm or deny any of the allegations. Angela Corning, Gowdy’s publicist, says the Congressman would certainly be eager to look into the details if this pans out, which is looking pretty good right about now.

The ammo went missing in early spring, 2010, while Hillary Clinton was still Secretary of State. The issue was handled as an “inventory discrepancy” and swept under the rug. Well…that rug has been lifted and what’s underneath is just, filthy.