Democrat Rep Pat McLean Caught Running A ‘Full-Service Prescription Narcotics Store’

US Representative Pat McLean (D – Minnesota) has been indicted on charges of running an illegal prescription narcotics ring inside the US Capitol. The Capitol building, with more than 60K employees, elected and appointed officials and their staffs, is statistically half Democrat, so there are bound to be thousands of addicts.

McLean, who is a licensed doctor, used his own prescription pads to create an opioid crisis among those in his own party, reaping the rewards for more than five years. According to McLean’s aide, Marjorie Seahagen, thousands of pills and pain patches went through the front door of his office every day.

Seahagen, who turned state’s evidence in exchange for immunity, told Fox News:

“There was Vicodan, Percocet, Oxycontin…all name brand. All the best. Everything you need to be a good pillhead. Morphine, dilaudid, patches, syringes. Want to move on to full-fledged junkie? We’ve got you covered.

There are thousands of little Demorats on drugs running around here. It’s no wonder this place crawls so slow.”

Liberals love to blame the slow pace of government under Trump on the fact that Republicans can’t seem to govern when the real problem is all the aides and inner-city congressmen running around on hospital-grade heroin. Now that McLean will be removed to do time in a federal prison, however, some of those addicts will need to clean themselves up.

Martin Belshner, Director of the non-partisan Office of Integrity, says the Capitol Police will be instructed to drug test all non-elected people working in the US Capitol. They aren’t allowed to test US Reps or Senators due to a law passed the same year as Obamacare designed to protect them from this exact thing.

At least one bad egg is being cracked.

Source: Patriot Post

Trump Administration Will File Papers To Withdraw From The UN

A White House insider close to President Trump has confirmed to Rasmussen that the administration will formally withdraw from the United Nations by Executive Action in 2018. The papers have been drawn up and sit ready to be signed and delivered to Vice-Minister Ngyuyen.

Critics are calling the authenticity of the report “questionable,” considering the storm a leak of this magnitude would create, but according to Hannity:

“There’s a good reason Trump would allow this to be leaked. He wants all of the legalities disposed of before he bothers signing it. The Democrats are already scrambling to stop him with the courts.”

The problem is, the courts can’t stop a President from ending a non-binding treaty like the UN Charter. According to Article 6 section 5 of the Constitution, The President shall “have the power to engage and disengage with other leaders of the world at will.” Constitutional scholars sometimes refer to it as the “omnipotence clause,” because it gives our President more power than most to make crucial decisions at a moment’s notice.

If the move is confirmed, economists expect the dollar to take a hit and for the market to adjust to a significantly lower number as the upper-tier of investors, aka the job creators, remove their investments to reinvest after the crisis. Retirement funds, loan rates, and public assistance programs may take a hit, but in the end, we’ll still have the REAL dreamers; those who stuck around and continued to believe in the United States of America.

God bless you, President Trump.

Source: Patriot Post

New Report Confirms Dems Lied About Tax Bill – Middle Class Gets Largest Cuts [Details]

Another Democrat narrative buster has just been revealed.

Dems continually lied about the recently passed GOP tax reform bill, claiming the middle class wouldn’t see any cuts. Go figure.

The middle class does get the largest portion of the wide-ranging cuts!

From Cato Institute:

The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) has released its distributional analysis of the final Republican tax bill. The bill provides even larger percentage cuts for middle earners than previous versions of the legislation.

The table below takes estimated payroll and excise taxes out of the JCT data. It shows individual and corporate income tax cuts as a percentage of estimated individual and corporate income taxes paid under current law. Middle-income households will receive by far the largest percentage income tax cuts in 2019.

More on Democrat lies, per Washington Examiner:

Democrats this week tried a new approach in their battle against the Republican tax cut bill: lying by omission.

Starting Monday, Democratic leaders released a talking point that said the bill would actually raise taxes on 86 million middle-class households or families, despite GOP claims it would reduce taxes for most people.

“Today, we face a GOP tax scam that raises taxes on 86 million middle-class families,” Pelosi said Tuesday. That was repeated over, and over, with no clarification.

Democrats this week tried a new approach in their battle against the Republican tax cut bill: lying by omission.

Starting Monday, Democratic leaders released a talking point that said the bill would actually raise taxes on 86 million middle-class households or families, despite GOP claims it would reduce taxes for most people.

“Today, we face a GOP tax scam that raises taxes on 86 million middle-class families,” Pelosi said Tuesday. That was repeated over, and over, with no clarification.
“History will indeed remember this vote. Future generations of Americans will remember who cast their votes to raise taxes on 86 million middle-class households,” said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., on the House floor.

What Democrats tried to hide is that their statement is based on one part of the Tax Policy Center’s analysis of the GOP bill, which focused on what would happen in 2027, after the individual tax cuts are set to expire.

What’s the immediate impact of the GOP bill, starting in 2018? Why, tax cuts for almost everyone, of course.

Another day, another lie.

What is it with these people?

Source: Conservative Post
 

After Meghan Pushes Back On Prenup & Obama Invite, Queen Slaps Her With ‘Brutal Surprise’

Behind the scenes, actress Meghan Markle is making all the wrong moves, causing the tabloid press in Britain to nickname her “Princess Pushy.” The Trump-hater, who fancies herself a leftist “activist,” was livid over the prenup Prince Harry asked her to sign. Then, there’s Princess Pushy’s tantrum over the Obamas, demanding Barack and Michelle are on the guest list, and that’s when the Queen took control, slapping Princess Pushy hard with a “brutal surprise.”

This isn’t Queen Elizabeth II’s first rodeo, having to deal with pushy fiances or potentially problematic royal weddings. Elizabeth never wanted to be queen, but her uncle Edward VIII (whom the royal family referred to by his last given name of David) abdicated the throne to marry an American socialite, three times divorced, named Wallis Simpson. This made Elizabeth’s father king, and the strain of the role ended his life early, making Elizabeth queen in 1952 when she was only 26 years old.

So, Meghan Markle being dubbed “Princess Pushy” by the Brits tells us the reported shenanigans behind the scenes have some merit. Markle was allegedly caught screaming at Prince Harry over the prenup, livid that the Queen would require her to sign it, and the altercation was leaked to the media. Of course, it also made its way over to Buckingham Palace, and the whole debacle did not sit well with the British monarch.

Just a few days later, the interview held with Barack Obama by Prince Harry, who insiders say is being influenced by Markle’s liberal stances in American politics, was released. “While the bulk of the interview involved talk of world leadership roles in the modern age of digital technology, mention of the royal wedding guest list did come up. The prince revealed during the chat he wasn’t yet sure if the Obamas would get an invite — despite speculation they are sure to be included,” reported Fox News.

The Sun, a British tabloid, reported, “Harry and fiancée Meghan Markle have told aides they want the former US president and wife Michelle at their big day on May 19. The young Royal couple’s dislike of the new president is well known.”

Well, no, Prince Harry’s like or dislike of President Donald Trump is not known at all. In fact, it’s imperative that all members of British royal family never make their own public sentiments on politics known. It goes back to their official role in Britain, as figureheads, as goodwill ambassadors, who must stay neutral on personal politics.

However, it’s Meghan Markle’s dislike of Trump that is well known, and if she lives up to her name, Princess Pushy, there’s no doubt she has given Harry an earful, peddling every liberal fake news talking point there is about our president. But, there’s one person Princess Pushy can’t influence, and that’s the real person in power — the Queen.

There’s every indication that the Queen is not enamored with the Obamas at all. No, she will not speak out publically, but only yesterday, Niles Gardiner, a former aide to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, spoke out about why the Obamas will not be invited. Gardiner is close friends with the Queen and reflects the monarch’s sentiments on Barack Obama and this royal wedding.

What Mr. Gardiner said, in a nutshell, is Barack Obama, as president, hated Britain and was disrespectful to the British people and their queen. Remember, Obama sent back the bust of the Queen’s favorite prime minister, Winston Churchill. So, Princess Pushy can go ahead and scream all she wants about her liberal activism and her love of Barack Obama, and Harry can make nice in an interview with him, but the Queen isn’t buying it at all. The Obamas will not be invited, said Gardiner, case closed.

The Queen has the complete picture of Markle — the good, the bad, and the ugly. In fact, there are even those who claim that Markle’s rapid transformation from American actress to a concerned citizen of the world has been a little too calculated. One such skeptic is Ninaki Priddy, her childhood best friend. “I’m not shocked at all,” Priddy said when she heard about the royal engagement, according to the Express. “It’s like she has been planning this all her life. She gets exactly what she wants and Harry has fallen for her play.”

Priddy, who has known Meghan since she was a toddler, posed for a tourist snap with Harry’s fiancée outside Buckingham Palace 15 years ago. She claims Meghan has always been obsessed with the Royal Family and added, “She wants to be Princess Diana 2.0. She will play her role ably, but my advice to him is to tread cautiously.”

The Queen is treading cautiously. If Markle thought she’d be getting hitched at the grand place for all royal weddings, Westminister Abbey or St. Paul’s Cathedral, she thought wrong. The Queen gave approval for the second rate digs at Windsor Castle, a total slight to Markle.

The Queen also told Markle that she’d have to be formally baptized and take religious/moral instruction and receive confirmation before she could marry Harry. That is another brutal surprise that isn’t quite aligned with her “liberal activism.” Most importantly, the press can call her “Princess Pushy,” but she’ll never have the title of princess. Nope, she’ll be a duchess, as long as she does not embarrass the British monarch. She serves at the pleasure of the queen, who can give titles and take them away.

Poor Princess Pushy. No Westminster Abbey, no Obama, and all that religious and moral instruction, along with a signed prenup. It looks like the Queen has things well under control. This may not be the fairytale free-ride Meghan Markle thought she had scored at all. When it comes to Princess Pushy versus the Queen, I’m betting on the queen every time. She remembers her father and her uncle, and she won’t be fooled by the likes of some wannabe actress again.

Source: Mad World News

Trump Discovers Elizabeth Warren Stole $5 BILLION From US Taxpayers – What She Did With It Is HORRIFYING

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren’s biggest achievement from her time in Congress has been the creation of the Consumer Protection Financial Bureau, or CFPB, which was created to act as a watchdog for the financial industry following the 2008-09 financial crisis. Now, however, what she was really doing with the agency has been discovered, and it’s not good.

It was just reported that Trump just appointed Mick Mulvaney to head the CFPB. This is bad for Warren, considering that Mulvaney once called the agency a “joke” and said he does not think it should even exist. Mulvaney is the right man to run this agency, however, since he knows what a nightmare it really is.

In a blistering Wall Street Journal piece last year, the newspaper’s editorial board took the hammer to the law. It stated that the CFPB “has complied record of abuse rivaling that of Washington’s most entrenched bureaucracies and may be operating outside of the parameters of the Constitution.” The WSJ also quoted lawyers representing a mortgage lender called “PHH,” which had been appealing the CFPB increasing a $6.4 million penalty the firm already owed to an additional $105 million.

“The President and the Congress have no control over this agency,” PHH’s lawyers stated in court. “The only check on this agency is right here, if it isn’t for the judiciary, this agency could do anything it wants.”

The CFPB is clearly an unconstitutional agency that has no problem wasting money. The agency pays 56 employees more than the $199,700 Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke receives. Federal Reserve governors get $179,700, a figure exceeded by 111 CFPB workers, while six-figure salaries go to 741 employees, or 61% of the CFPB workforce, with one in four taking home $150,00 or more.

In a blistering Wall Street Journal piece last year, the newspaper’s editorial board took the hammer to the law. It stated that the CFPB “has complied record of abuse rivaling that of Washington’s most entrenched bureaucracies and may be operating outside of the parameters of the Constitution.” The WSJ also quoted lawyers representing a mortgage lender called “PHH,” which had been appealing the CFPB increasing a $6.4 million penalty the firm already owed to an additional $105 million.

“The President and the Congress have no control over this agency,” PHH’s lawyers stated in court. “The only check on this agency is right here, if it isn’t for the judiciary, this agency could do anything it wants.”

The CFPB is clearly an unconstitutional agency that has no problem wasting money. The agency pays 56 employees more than the $199,700 Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke receives. Federal Reserve governors get $179,700, a figure exceeded by 111 CFPB workers, while six-figure salaries go to 741 employees, or 61% of the CFPB workforce, with one in four taking home $150,00 or more.

•Funneled a large portion of the more than $5 billion in penalties collected from defendants to community organizers aligned with Democrats — “a slush fund by another name,” said a consultant who worked with CFPB on its Civil Penalty Fund and requested anonymity.

Source: Conservative Post

Trump’s Going After the Clintons!

It went over the heads of most of the media, but just before Christmas, President Trump made a move that very well may signal the beginning of the end for the Clintons and their fellow swamp-dwellers.

Over the weekend, President Trump signed a new executive order explicitly declaring a national “state of emergency.”

At stake is putting an end to human rights abuses and corruption that harm innocent victims around the world and damage American interests and national security.

The executive order is full of legal-speak, but Trump also wrote a letter to Congress explaining the order and his reasoning.

That letter reads:

I hereby report that I have issued the enclosed Executive Order (the “order”) declaring a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.

The order blocks the property and interests in property of persons listed in the Annex to the order. It also blocks the property and interests in property of any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General…

The Annex to the order lists the 13 people Trump is specifically targeting with the order, though others will certainly be impacted by it.

What’s interesting is that many of those people have ties to the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, or Clinton associates.

Zerohedge spoke to an attorney who was consulted on the order. He said the move targets not only the Clintons, but every corrupt politician in Washington who has made shady deals with foreign bad guys.

“Virtually every lobbyist in DC has got to be in a cold sweat over the scope of this EO,” he said.

Source: Conservative Post

Nancy Pelosi To Resign Amid Harassment Allegetions

Yet another member of the Democrat party is about to step down for being a lying scumbag who harasses their underlings — bit it might shock you who it is this time.

According to Breitbart News, a male page is now accusing House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of some pretty horrible stuff.

Breitbart reports that House page Neil Smith has accused Pelosi of sexual harassment thanks to the way she treated him behind closed doors.

Smith says he was forced to “perform duties far outside the range of normal,” which included “providing Pelosi with foot rubs and other services which made Mr Smith feel uncomfortable.

Pelosi has not bothered to deny the allegations, which are reportedly backed by surveillance footage.

Pelosi is expected to step down “within weeks” of the beginning of 2018 and the California governor is already seeking a replacement.

According to Breitbart, “many names” are being considered for a replacement though no specifics are available immediately.

Once again we are able to see the Democrat Party for what it is, and once again we are reminded that you never see this kind of think when republicans are involved.

Roy Moore Wins Alabama Senate Seat

An email from the Alabama Secretary of State to the Roy Moore campaign has been leaked to the Associated Press. A staffer in the main newsroom told our reporter in the field that they should have the second verification they need to release the news by 10 AM Friday that Roy Moore has won the Alabama special election.

The news, which will come as a shock to many, is exactly what Moore was expecting once the votes of American patriots in the military came in and the reason why he refused to concede the race to Jones.

The email reads as follows:

To: roymooreandjesusforsenate@hotmail.com

From: ALSecState@alabama.gov

RE: Final tally

Dear sir,

As requested, here are the final totals of the 2017 special election runoff:

67,435 votes for Roy Moore

67,323 votes for Doug Jones

The Office of Elections will certify the results when they return to work on January 3rd, 2018.

Best,

Moe

Democrats are about to blow a gasket. Fox News and Breitbart have also confirmed through back channels that they’ll be announcing in the morning as well.

400% Gas Tax Increase For California,Then Lawmakers Give Themselves FREE Gasoline and Cars

The Governor of California Jerry Brown has just signed a new tax increase taking the price-based excise gas tax from $.10 a gallon to $.50 a gallon. The saddest thing of this new legislation is that Brown and his ultra liberal legislature doesn’t pay one cent for the gasoline that they use! They actually get free gas!

They gave it to themselves in 2008, so the crazy gas tax they just passed does not effect them, they probably are going to spend it on left wing pet projects.

Here are the details on the gas tax increase:

Existing: The base excise tax is 18 cents a gallon. A price-based excise tax is currently set at 9.8 cents a gallon, for a total rate of 27.8 cents a gallon.
Nov. 1, 2017: The base excise tax will increase to 30 cents a gallon.

July 1, 2019: The price-based excise tax will reset to 17.3 cents a gallon, about half-a-cent more than the rate the Brown administration projects will be in effect by then anyway.

The 47.3-cent combined excise tax in effect July 1, 2019 will be adjusted for inflation beginning July 1, 2020.

California is unique in giving legislators free rein on transportation spending, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In most other states, lawmakers must submit the same kind of mileage-expense forms used by companies to reimburse employees for their business travel.

“You have to prove what you’re using it for,” said Morgan Cullin, a Denver-based researcher for the bipartisan national organization.

On top of free gas, California lawmakers also get state-issued vehicles, another perk that most states avoid.

California is in debt $1.3 Trillion. That means every citizen in California is in debt almost $33,000. That is, unless you just move out!!! This represents a significant debt burden even by international standards.

Not included are billions of dollars in deferred maintenance and upgrades to California’s infrastructure. To the extent California’s government has not maintained investment in infrastructure maintenance, it has passed this cost on to future generations who will have to issue additional debt to pay for this expense.

So Sacramento is working hard to get every way it can to find more cash to spend!

California will have an estimated $52billion more cash to help cover the state’s transportation needs for the next decade. But we know it is not going to be spent well. There’s always a whole lot of waste fraud and abuse in Sacramento spending. Like free gas and automobiles for the lawmakers!The gasoline tax increase sets ambitious objectives, as they say.

That will not happen, the money will be spent on left wing pet projects. California lawmakers are famous for passing legislation which they exempt themselves from. They voted 28-8 to exempt themselves from the gun-control legislation that applies to the remainder of the California. You think maybe this can cause Californians to grow up?

Do You Support Trump’s Decision To Recognize Jerusalem As the Israel’s Capital??

People around the world are furious about Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Not only is President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and begin the process of moving the U.S. embassy there one of the boldest moves of his presidency.

It is one of the boldest moves any U.S. president has made since the beginning of the Oslo “peace process” in 1993.

Critics say that recognizing Jerusalem as the Israeli capital will wreck the peace process, but others argue the peace process has been frozen for a long time now.

Do you support Trump backing Israel and recognizing Jerusalem as their capital?