George Soros Paid 3 Democrats Millions To Vote For Shutdown

Democrat Senators Fred Marken, Louis Kearns and Gerald Harmon are all under investigation for taking bribes from a PAC fund tied to none other than George Soros. The PAC, DemWatch2020, is run by notorious liberal troublemaker Sandy Batt who has declined to comment.

Soros, who enjoys Hungarian citizenship, says he doesn’t care who knows that he buys Congressmen:

“When Charles Koch does it, he’s a patriot. When I do it, I’m a criminal.”

The three senators could be guilty of taking dark money if it’s determined that Soros’ cash came from overseas. At any rate, the timing is criminal in and of itself. No elected official is supposed to take campaign contributions of any kind based on a single vote. It’s under those pretenses that the House Ethics Committee will investigate.

Source: Ladies Of Liberty

Bank Forecloses On Malia Obama’s Chicago Home

When Malia Obama bought an apartment on the 42nd floor of Marina Towers, one of the most exclusive apartment buildings in the city of Chicago, many wondered if her daddy was helping her pay for it. Apparently, we now have an answer to that question — no.

According to a public notice published in the Chicago Tribune’s print edition Monday, Bank of America is foreclosing on the property.

According to the notice, no payments have been made on the property “in a full calendar year.”

Obama purchased the property on her 18th birthday but apparently decided that she didn’t want to keep making payments because the Obamas are not used to spending their own money for things they want.

According to neighbor Bruce Smithfield, the Obama daughter has used her apartment, throwing “repeated” loud parties with her “hood rat friends” whenever she is on break from Harvard, where she barely maintains a “c” average.

It is unclear why her father is not throwing his own money at his daughters problems like he usually does, but the apartment is due to be auctioned next month.

This is yet another example of the Obamas being nothing but leeches on our society.

Hopefully this will be an important lesson for Malia, but we doubt it

Source: Patriot Post, Conservative Forever, The Last Line Of Defense

Trump & Sarah Sanders Just Found White House Leaker, Now They’re Making Him Pay BIG TIME

For months now, someone in the White House has been leaking sensitive information to the public, putting national security at risk and gravely undermining the Trump administration’s progress. It was only a matter of time before President Donald Trump and one of the top officials in his administration, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, identified the culprit, and it appears that they have. Now, Trump and Sanders are making the leaker pay for his bad behavior, as they should.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) doesn’t have the best name recognition in Washington, D.C., but lately, he’s been working diligently to change that by doing two things in particular; namely, getting in front of the camera any chance he gets to trash President Trump and leaking sensitive White House information.

If you’re one of the millions of Americans who have no idea who Rep. Schiff is, Daily News Briefing provided a solid summary of his background:

If you are familiar with Adam Schiff at all you know that he has no interest in the truth or working across the aisle. He’s a partisan who only cares about advancing his liberal agenda and bashing Trump. He also loves being on TV. Every time there is a camera around you will find Adam Schiff running with the phony Russia narrative or hurling some wild accusation at Trump.

Yep, that pretty much sums up Adam Schiff.

After rumors began spreading over the past few months that Schiff was the one who has been leaking sensitive White House intelligence to the public, President Donald Trump blatantly called him out in a Thursday interview with The Wall Street Journal.

“All I see of these Democrats, like Adam Schiff — it’s all he does, he’ll have a meeting, and then he’ll leave, and he’ll call up the meeting, and then I’ll have a meeting and then he’ll leave,” said Trump.

“He left meetings where people are being interviewed, and then all of a sudden they say a story about what’s going on inside the meetings,” added the president, leaving no doubt that he believes Schiff is the leaker.

President Trump and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders both accused California Rep. Adam Schiff of selectively leaking details of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation.

Trump put Schiff on blast during an interview with The Wall Street Journal in the Oval Office on Thursday morning. [Source: The Daily Caller]

Schiff demanded an apology from the White House in an apparent attempt to defend himself. However, he did not expressly come out and deny that he was responsible for the leaks, which is very telling.

“They owe me an apology, but frankly it would be a wasted errand to ask for one,” Schiff said on CNN. “And if Sarah Huckabee Sanders is going to have to give out apologies to everyone that he has criticized unfairly, she would be doing nothing else all day.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Thursday that the White House owes him an apology after press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused him of leaking House Intelligence Committee interviews to the press. [Source: The Hill]

Frankly, President Donald Trump and Sarah Sanders handled this brilliantly. If lawmakers like Adam Schiff want to play dirty by betraying the president’s trust and leaking information to the press, then they’re only getting a taste of their own medicine when the president himself calls them out in front of the entire nation.

If Adam Schiff was trying to make a name for himself, he has certainly accomplished as much. Unfortunately for him, that name is now synonymous with the word “traitor.

Source: Mad World News

SCOTUS Shoots Down Obama’s $30 Million Taxpayer-Funded Funeral And Monument Plans

Former President Barack Obama was reduced to tears today when the Supreme Court ruled that his burial monument, courtesy of the US taxpayer, was an unconstitutional waste of money that would need legislation to enact.

Obama, who thought he’d be getting a monument for his family to be buried in right on the National Mall between the Washington Monument and the White House, was crushed at the news and blamed racism for the destruction of his dream:

“Had it been any other man with any other skin color to be the first black President they would be given monuments in every city in America. Only the black man is penalized for being black.”

Critics say the statement is contradictory and won’t make sense to conservatives, whose ability to reason cognitively reduces drastically when verbiage of an intellectual nature is associated with politics. Conservatives disagree, saying that Trump is the best President and he should get a monument.

The Supreme Court ruling, which is all that really matters, was 5-4 against giving Obama and his family a taxpayer-funded burial plot on what would probably qualify as some of the most valuable real estate in the world.

Liberals on the court were disappointed, saying that the first black president should be honored. The monument, which would be smaller than those to Lincoln, Jefferson and Washington, would display progress and “social evolution,” according to Michelle Obama and her big stupid opinion.

President Trump weighed in on the decision with approval, tweeting that no future president should have to look at that monstrosity while standing on the Eisenhower balcony.

Another defeat for Obama and the race-baiters. The world is finally turning around.

President Trump Just Saved Christmas For 13 Million Retirees

13 million people over the age of 65 are about to get letters from the IRS informing them that President Trump has declared them the recipients of a Christmas stimulus to offset the horrible performance of this year’s Black Friday. To qualify, you must be over 65, retired, receive social security and have an income under $40K per year.

The stimulus, part of the yearly discretionary budget to use at the discretion of the Chief Executive, is the remainder of the till for 2017. Each recipient will receive

The letter will also come with an offer to pledge support for President Trump, a requirement the Attorney General says is perfectly legal and patriotic, though not fully enforceable. White House Director of Information and Propaganda, Art Trubolls, says the fine-print is there for a reason:

“If you ask liberals to pledge support for the office of the President they’ll start burning down their own cities. Unless there’s a black man, a gay person or a woman in the Oval Office they’ll never be satisfied. They call Trump a racist but he’s vilified every day for being a white male. It’s hypocrisy at its finest.”

President Trump already enjoys the highest approval rating of any president of all time among seniors in this country. There’s a reason for that. With age comes wisdom. Just look at President Trump’s supporters. They’re as American as it gets.

The letters will be sent sometime this coming week. If you don’t get yours, call the White House switchboard at (202) 456-1414 and let them know.

Supreme Court Allows Christian-Owned Mississippi Businesses To Refuse Service To LGBT’s

Mississippi’s Republican-backed religious rights law has been allowed to stand, proving to be a major setback for the militant anti-heterosexual gay supremacist movement, activists say. The law enables business and government employees to refuse service to members of the LGBT community based on religious beliefs.

The United States Supreme Court on Monday ended the first legal challenge to a Republican-backed Mississippi law that permits businesses and government employees to refuse to serve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people because of their religious beliefs.

The Supreme Court justices left in place a June ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals that the plaintiffs – same-sex couples, civil rights advocates including the head of the state NAACP chapter, a church and others – did not have legal standing to bring the lawsuit.

The law, passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Phillip Bryant with the backing of conservative Christian activists, has not yet been implemented and more legal challenges are expected, according to gay rights lawyers, reports Fox News.

“We will keep fighting in Mississippi until we overturn this harmful law, and in any state where antigay legislators pass laws to roll back LGBT civil rights,” said Beth Littrell, a lawyer with gay rights group Lambda Legal.

The 2016 law was passed in the aftermath of the US Supreme Court’s landmark 2015 ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.

Supporters call it a religious liberty law that protects the sincerely held religious beliefs and moral convictions of individuals and businesses. Opponents said it authorizes discrimination against LGBT people in violation of the US Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection under the law and the separation of church and state. What they forget is there is actually nothing in the Constitution about the separation of church and state, that is a court ruling.

Conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom is helping the state defend the law.

“Good laws like Mississippi’s protect freedom and harm no one,” said Kevin Theriot, one of the group’s lawyers.

Mississippi’s law was one of a series of measures proposed in socially conservative, Republican-dominated states that gay rights advocates viewed as an attempt to undermine the high court’s gay marriage ruling.

The law, called the Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, protects the beliefs that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, sex outside such a marriage is improper and gender is determined by anatomy and genetics at birth and cannot change.

Among other things, the measure lets businesses refuse to provide marriage-related services to same-sex couples and allows judges, magistrates and justices of the peace to refuse to perform same-sex weddings.

The measure was blocked in 2016 by a Mississippi-based federal judge who said it unconstitutionally allowed “arbitrary discrimination” against LGBT people and unmarried people. The 5th Circuit overturned that ruling.

Source: o4news.com

Trailer Trash Tramp Miley Cyrus Babbles Incoherently About Gun Control

In the wake of the heinous Texas church attack, pop mega-star, and trailer trash tramp Miley Cyrus attacked President Trump’s stance against more gun control and demanded the passage of new gun laws.

The manly-voiced Voice coach whined in an Instagram post on Monday how a “WHITE AMERICAN MAN!” had perpetrated another mass shooting, revealing that she’s “disgusted” and “embarrassed” by her country for not passing more gun laws.

Her push comes in spite of the fact that the attacker passed a background check for his rifle and in spite of President Trump’s assertion that new gun laws would do more harm than good.

Cyrus slammed Trump and stood against his contention that the Sutherland Springs’ attack was a mental illness issue, rather than a gun issue, writing on Instagram: “I’d like to believe that EVERY person who takes the life of another being is ‘mentally ill. It’s hard to conceptualize that a sane human could commit such a hideous crime. BUT I am sorry Donald Trump this absolutely is a ‘GUNS SITUATION.’”

My dreams have become nightmares & those nightmares , reality … This isn't fair , this isn't right , this isn't just , this isn't human! This is a TERRORIST act by a WHITE AMERICAN MAN! I am heartbroken & embarrassed. Mortified by our country & its shitty system , lack of control/laws! This does NOT HAVE or NEED to happen! It's devastatingly disgusting! This is exactly why the lyrics of Bad Mood were so important for me to share on a major platform. I wanted to bring awareness to the fact that everyday we are waking up to more terrifyingly painful information that makes it nearly impossible to feel optimistic that things are going to change! They say it gets worst before it gets better in some cases & I wish on every star that this is the worst of it! I continue to be hopeful that enough is enough and the eyes of the ignorant will open and realize that (gun) VIOLENCE has to stop! This assholes Facebook profile photo was a fucking riffle ! "I don't know how much more it can take!" #FuckGuns #FuckViolence 🚫💔🚫💔 My love is with you TX!

A post shared by Miley Cyrus (@mileycyrus) on

It’s likely she doesn’t recognize it as a mental health issue, because Miley herself is bat-shit crazy.

NATIONAL NEWS
Trailer Trash Tramp Miley Cyrus Babbles Incoherently About Gun Control #o4a #guns
November 12, 2017 5:19 pm by Founder
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Print this pageEmail this to someone
Mr Americana, Overpasses News Desk
November 12th, 2017

In the wake of the heinous Texas church attack, pop mega-star, and trailer trash tramp Miley Cyrus attacked President Trump’s stance against more gun control and demanded the passage of new gun laws.

The manly-voiced Voice coach whined in an Instagram post on Monday how a “WHITE AMERICAN MAN!” had perpetrated another mass shooting, revealing that she’s “disgusted” and “embarrassed” by her country for not passing more gun laws.

Her push comes in spite of the fact that the attacker passed a background check for his rifle and in spite of President Trump’s assertion that new gun laws would do more harm than good.

Cyrus slammed Trump and stood against his contention that the Sutherland Springs’ attack was a mental illness issue, rather than a gun issue, writing on Instagram: “I’d like to believe that EVERY person who takes the life of another being is ‘mentally ill. It’s hard to conceptualize that a sane human could commit such a hideous crime. BUT I am sorry Donald Trump this absolutely is a ‘GUNS SITUATION.’”

It’s likely she doesn’t recognize it as a mental health issue, because Miley herself is bat-shit crazy.

The problem with Cyrus’ arguments is that they are theoretical; they deal with human nature via the progressive prism that sees the possibility of utopia here on earth.

In reality, such utopia is not possible. Rather, the actions of a bad guy are only kept in check by good guys who can shoot back.

In short, Miley Cyrus doesn’t have a clue what she’s talking about. As if anyone with an ounce of sense would take anything she says seriously?

President Trump recognizes this, which is why he views gun control as dangerous because it limits the ability of law-abiding citizens to acquire the guns they need for self-defense. In the case of the Sutherland Springs, Texas, attack, it might have prevented Stephen Willeford from possessing the gun he needed to stop the church attacker.

As Trump astutely observed, “[With more gun control] you might not have had that very brave person who happened to have a gun or a rifle in his truck, go out and shoot [the attacker], and hit him, neutralize him”, reports Breitbart.

Should the Texas church attacker, Devin Kelley, have been able to buy a gun? Not based on his 2012 arrest and subsequent conviction. But the Air Force somehow fumbled reporting his record to the National Instant Criminal Background Check system (NICS). So the need is not for new laws or new systems, but for full compliance — including information sharing — with the system that is already in place.

After taking heat from several social media users over her “white American man” comment, Cyrus posted another picture to Instagram of her “favorite WHITE AMERICAN MALES” — including her father, Billy Ray Cyrus, and her two brothers.

Source: o4news.com
 

Lindsey Graham to Americans: ‘Your Country Does Not Belong to You – It Belongs to?

According to amnesty advocate Sen. Lindsey Graham, America is not owned by Americans and their children but is instead held by people all over the globe.

“I’ve always believed that America is an idea [which is] not defined by its people but by its ideals,” Graham said in a press statement January 12 which sought to criticise President Donald Trump for describing some foreign countries as less pleasant than America, or as “shitholes.”

Graham continued:

The American ideal is embraced by people all over the globe. It was best said a long time ago, E Pluribus Unum – Out of Many, One. Diversity has always been our strength, not our weakness. In reforming immigration we cannot lose these American Ideals.

In his pro-immigration statement, Graham also argued that government-imposed civic variety — “diversity” — is an American ideal that is ensured by mass-immigration, Breitbart reports.

In contrast, President Donald Trump won the 2016 election because voters shared his frequently expressed favoritism towards his own country and his fellow citizens. In his inauguration speech, Trump declared:

This is your day. This is your celebration. And this, the United States of America, is your country. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.

The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer. Everyone is listening to you now. You came by the tens of millions to become part of a historic movement the likes of which the world has never seen before.

At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction: that a nation exists to serve its citizens. Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves. These are the just and reasonable demands of a righteous public.

Polls show that Trump’s American-first immigration policy is very popular. For example, a December poll of likely 2018 voters shows two-to-one voter support for Trump’s pro-American immigration policies, and a lopsided four-to-one opposition against the cheap-labor, mass-immigration, economic policy pushed by bipartisan establishment-backed D.C. interest-groups.

The American people voted for President Donald Trump because we believe in America first, strong borders and strong immigration policies. We believe in lawful immigration and expect our elected officials, like Sen. Lindsey Graham, to adhere to, and enforce the Laws of the Constitution – especially those pertaining to immigration.

…It Belongs to the World?

Read the full story here.

Source: o4news.com

 

Trump Lays Foundation To Seize Assets & Arrest George Soros & MANY MORE

President Trump signs Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption, otherwise known as the foundation to seize assets of corrupt politicians.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Source: o4news.com

Trump Just Delivered Some Bad News To Entitled Welfare Leeches Who Refuse To Get A Job

After years of bleeding the taxpayers dry with Obama-phones, unlimited benefits, and bottomless food stamps, welfare leeches who refuse to pull their own weight aren’t going to like what President Donald Trump just announced. You’re going to love this.

While Barack Obama will always be remembered as the president who illegally ran guns to drug cartels, empowered a nuclear Iran, and freed a record number of Islamic terrorists, his economic legacy is just as devastating. Like a preteen garnering votes for class president, the former community organizer-in-chief injected taxpayer funds into failed social programs in a bid to secure votes from the perpetually dependent, impoverished, Democrat-run ghettos.

Although 8 years of frivolous spending, terrible deals, and surmounting debt were left to Trump, the “America first” businessman is rescinding Obama mandates faster than the mainstream media can spin a story. However, Trump’s latest repeal is going to have the welfare leeches and career druggies creeping out of the woodwork like never before.

Breitbart reports that the Trump administration has officially unveiled a new regulation which will require drug testing for unemployment benefit recipients as well as a stipulation that they must prove they are “job-ready from day one.” In his signing of the Congressional Review Act (CRA), President Trump was able to repeal an Obama-era mandate that prevented states from drug testing unemployment benefit applicants.

House Ways and Means chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) proposed the repeal, which was sponsored by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), explaining that the regulation will crack down on both those who rely on welfare while abusing narcotics that prevent them from obtaining gainful employment as well as those who have no intention of re-entering the workforce.

“President Trump just signed into law my bill that abolishes an Obama-era rule. After five years of battling with the Obama Department of Labor, states like Texas will now be allowed to drug test folks on unemployment to ensure they are job-ready from day one. This is a win for families, workers, job creators, and local economies,” Brady explained.

Although American unemployment is holding at a 17-year record low, the Trump administration’s regulation will undoubtedly tighten up restrictions for such welfare to ensure that it is being utilized as a boost to enter the workforce instead of an incentive to continue to remain jobless.

Previously, Republicans confirmed that the 2016 unemployment mandate only allowed the requirement for jobless Americans to submit drug testing if they were in positions that commonly required it, such as commercial and public transit drivers, airline pilots and crew members, and jobs that require the person to carry a firearm. However, the new regulation will allow states to drug test a wider range of applicants who seek unemployment benefits. Those who fail testing will be subjected to rejection or termination of their welfare.

Strategic Services on Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation President Doug Holmes reiterated that if applicants want benefits, they must be sober and actively seeking out employment, according to The Hill.

“This is an insurance program, it’s not public assistance,” he said. “An individual has to be available and able to work. If they’re not available and able to work, week by week by week, then they don’t meet the requirements to be paid unemployment compensation benefits. If an individual has a significant problem that renders him or her unavailable to work, the appropriate response is to refer them to a place to get help. They should not be paid unemployment benefits.”

Until Trump’s repeal, only 3 states refuted Obama’s mandate to allow drug testing for their unemployment insurance program — Texas, Mississippi, and Wisconsin. Fortunately, all 50 states will be empowered to implement the regulation as early as June, according to the Labor Department.

Welfare was never intended to be an incentive for laziness or lawlessness. On the contrary, these taxpayer benefits were always meant to serve as a springboard for the unfortunate to get back on their feet again.

For 2 terms, former President Barack Obama showed the American people that he cared much more for the welfare abusers, Gitmo terrorists, illegal aliens, and elite political crooks rather than the hard-working citizens he was elected to represent. Now, we have a leader who not only refuses to bow to our global enemies but seeks to empower our nation to reach the level of progress and prosperity it deserves.

Source: Symbol Of Law